Verified Document

Animal Rights Ethics Term Paper

Animal Rights and Ethics

Ingram (2001) in an article hosted by Stop Animal Exploitation NOW! (SAEN) organization reports accusations of animal rights abuses by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). There are three levels of animal use in research: experiments with minimal distress, experiments with the potential for distress but using pain relievers and experiments with the potential for distress without medication. Detailed regulations in the Animal Welfare Act state that there must be justification for moving to different levels of use and the USDA is accused by SAEN of ignoring these laws.

The underlying ethics behind the allegations against the USDA are that it is always unethical to allow animals to be in pain in scientific experiments. However, the law is not on the accusers' side, and therefore, they quibble that researchers unnecessarily and illegally move to levels of research in violation of the Animal Welfare Act.

For the author's part (Ingram, 2001), he presents both sides of the debate. Spokespeople for the USDA report that they are complying with appropriate laws and reporting requirements, but did not reveal why it was necessary to move to higher levels of animal use. However, it only seems logical that they would not have done so if they could accomplish the same results without doing so. And, researchers need the flexibility to engage in whatever level of animal use is necessary to benefit humans and should be able to conduct their activities without harassment by groups such as SAEN.

Kant would support the USDA while a utilitarian view would not. According to Kant, morally permissible actions are those actions that could be willed by all rational individuals. Animals lack a will, and therefore do not have intrinsic value. Utilitarianism, on the other hand, judges actions based upon their consequences and seeks to maximize the utility, or good, of those consequences while minimizing the harms. To give more importance to some things over others is wrong. Given the differences in Kant's view and utilitarianism, it would be impossible to develop a universal maxim or greater good, because animal rights activists and scientific researchers would be displeased with the actions that they would be forced to act on.

Bibliography

Ingram, D. (2001, July 18) Animal activists issue complaint. The Chronicle. Retrieved April 19, 2004 from Web site: http://www.all-creatures.org/saen/media-chr-18jul2001.html

Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Animal Rights Ethics and Morality
Words: 3748 Length: 12 Document Type: Term Paper

These abilities are inclusive of memory emotion, belief, desire, intentional actions and an awareness of the future. With these things being understood this theory asserts that mammals not only have physical bodies that are alive but they also function as psychological beings whose existence can get better or worse. Proponents of this theory argue that other mammals have this capacity even though they cannot use human language to articulate

Animal Rights Ethical Standards of
Words: 1039 Length: 3 Document Type: Term Paper

Based on these facts, the scientific community and animal welfare groups support animal experiments in medical research where it is found to be absolutely necessary. To counter the main argument in favor of animal experiments, animal rights groups contend that all sentient creatures are capable of feeling pain and, therefore, conducting experiments on animals is the moral equivalent to using brain damaged humans or infants before the age of reasoning

Animal Rights Activist and Professor Tom Regan
Words: 356 Length: 1 Document Type: Essay

Animal rights activist and Professor Tom Regan holds the position that it is justifiable to completely abolish the use of animals in science, agriculture, hunting and so on. He justifies this position on the theory of inherent value which he defines as the state in which every being is more than a mere receptable, and he concludes that all who have inherent value are to have it equally. Therefore, if

Animal Rights Introduction Glance at
Words: 2298 Length: 8 Document Type: Term Paper

.. it's healthy, it's somebody's way of life, it's somebody's livelihood, it's somebody's business.(ibid) This is a strongly worded statement and indictment of an uncaring humanity. However, bearing in mind the daily evidence of cruelty to animals one cannot but feel that there is an element of truth to this argument. Commercial reasons for abuse One of the central reasons or "justifications" for animal abuse and possibly why so many turn a blind

Animal Rights Over the Past
Words: 2596 Length: 7 Document Type: Essay

Animals in captivity, for example, have often been genetically, behaviorally or anatomically manipulated in order to enhance acclimation to the new environment. Similarly, animals have been neutered, declawed or defanged to be more compatible with their human keepers. Those who are in support of captivity of animals need to revisit such earlier condoned behavior and ensure that animals receive necessary care, nutrition and exercise and live in proper caging

Animal Rights in the Debate
Words: 1606 Length: 5 Document Type: Term Paper

Part III - Resolution. I argue that it is irrelevant whether animals have rights; even if not, we should conduct ourselves toward them as if they did. On this planet, the form of life most fit for survival in a Darwinian sense is Homo sapiens. We are more fit because we are better able than any other living thing to fully utilize our biologic advantages in tandem with the variables

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now